-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 702
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
{tools}[GCCcore/10.2.0] configurable-http-proxy v4.2.1, nodejs v12.19.0, JupyterHub v1.1.0 w/ Python 3.8.6 #11558
{tools}[GCCcore/10.2.0] configurable-http-proxy v4.2.1, nodejs v12.19.0, JupyterHub v1.1.0 w/ Python 3.8.6 #11558
Conversation
…nodejs-12.19.0-GCCcore-10.2.0.eb, JupyterHub-1.1.0-GCCcore-10.2.0.eb
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
…asyconfigs into 20201022004658_new_pr_configurable-http-proxy421
@boegelbot please test @ generoso |
@Micket: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... - notification for comment with ID 714389179 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
Test report by @Micket |
Test report by @boegelbot |
Test report by @boegel |
Test report by @boegel |
I think this is good to merge @boegel |
Test report by @smoors |
Going in, thanks @Micket! |
|
||
builddependencies = [ | ||
('binutils', '2.35'), | ||
('Python', '3.8.6'), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Apparently nodejs
still requires python2
at configure time... Fixed in #11679
(created using
eb --new-pr
)depends on
#11536(for Mako)I intentionally didn't follow the old configs naming convention for JupyterHub