Skip to content

Force-running seeds, in addition to "normal tests" #4406

Answered by dubzzz
stdedos asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

In order to do so I'd rather use the examples option that can be passed to assert.

Compared to "seed+path" which has been designed to simplify the replay for troubleshoot, this one has been designed to persist test cases forever. It will not break on minor bumps of fast-check while "seed+path" might not led to the same case after a bump on the minor.

Replies: 1 comment 1 reply

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@stdedos
Comment options

Answer selected by stdedos
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants