Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature 2640 ioda2nc dimension #2674

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Sep 5, 2023
Merged

Conversation

hsoh-u
Copy link
Collaborator

@hsoh-u hsoh-u commented Aug 31, 2023

Expected Differences

ioda2nc processes the IODA input with Location dimension instead of nlocs dimension.

  • Do these changes introduce new tools, command line arguments, or configuration file options? [No]

    If yes, please describe:

  • Do these changes modify the structure of existing or add new output data types (e.g. statistic line types or NetCDF variables)? [No]

    If yes, please describe:

Pull Request Testing

  • Describe testing already performed for these changes:

/d1/personal/hsoh/git/pull_request/MET_feature_2640_ioda2nc_dimension/bin/ioda2nc /d1/personal/hsoh/data/IODA_files/avhrr_radiance_location.nc met_avhrr_radiance_location.nc /d1/personal/hsoh/git/pull_request/MET_feature_2640_ioda2nc_dimension/share/met/config/IODA2NCConfig -v 3 -obs_var brightness_temperature

  • Recommend testing for the reviewer(s) to perform, including the location of input datasets, and any additional instructions:

If you have IODAS V3 data file (with nlocs dimension), make a IODA file with Location dimension.

ncdump IODAV3_filename > IODAV3_filename.dump
sed -i -e "s|nlocs|Location|g" IODAV3_filename.dump
ncgen -o IODAV3_filename.Location.nc IODAV3_filename.dump
  • Do these changes include sufficient documentation updates, ensuring that no errors or warnings exist in the build of the documentation? [Yes]

  • Do these changes include sufficient testing updates? [No]

  • Will this PR result in changes to the test suite? [no]

    If yes, describe the new output and/or changes to the existing output:

  • Please complete this pull request review by [Fill in date].

Pull Request Checklist

See the METplus Workflow for details.

  • Review the source issue metadata (required labels, projects, and milestone).
  • Complete the PR definition above.
  • Ensure the PR title matches the feature or bugfix branch name.
  • Define the PR metadata, as permissions allow.
    Select: Reviewer(s) and Development issue
    Select: Milestone as the version that will include these changes
    Select: Coordinated METplus-X.Y Support project for bugfix releases or MET-X.Y.Z Development project for official releases
  • After submitting the PR, select the ⚙️ icon in the Development section of the right hand sidebar. Search for the issue that this PR will close and select it, if it is not already selected.
  • After the PR is approved, merge your changes. If permissions do not allow this, request that the reviewer do the merge.
  • Close the linked issue and delete your feature or bugfix branch from GitHub.

@hsoh-u hsoh-u added this to the MET 12.0.0 milestone Aug 31, 2023
@hsoh-u hsoh-u requested a review from jprestop August 31, 2023 18:47
@JohnHalleyGotway JohnHalleyGotway linked an issue Aug 31, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
21 tasks
@jprestop
Copy link
Collaborator

jprestop commented Sep 1, 2023

HI @hsoh-u. Can you please confirm that these are expected differences (from the failing test)?

COMPARING ioda2nc/odb_sonde_16019_all.nc
file1: /data/output/met_test_truth/ioda2nc/odb_sonde_16019_all.nc
file2: /data/output/met_test_output/ioda2nc/odb_sonde_16019_all.nc
ERROR: NetCDF headers differ:
6c6
< 	nhdr = 2 ;
---
> 	nhdr = 96 ;
8,9c8,9
< 	nhdr_typ = 1 ;
< 	nhdr_sid = 1 ;
---
> 	nhdr_typ = 23 ;
> 	nhdr_sid = 20 ;

End of script
ERROR: Differences exist in the output
Error: Process completed with exit code 1.

@hsoh-u
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hsoh-u commented Sep 1, 2023

I did not expect differences. I will take a look.

@hsoh-u
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hsoh-u commented Sep 1, 2023

Ready for review

Copy link
Collaborator

@jprestop jprestop left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I do not have an IODAS V3 data file and am relying on the testing by @hsoh-u. I have reviewed the code changes and have ensured that all tests passed. I approve this request.

@hsoh-u hsoh-u merged commit 1dd0917 into develop Sep 5, 2023
33 checks passed
@hsoh-u hsoh-u deleted the feature_2640_ioda2nc_dimension branch September 5, 2023 16:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: 🏁 Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update ioda2nc to support version 3 IODA files
2 participants