SqlTraceFlag: Fix for #1688

[Fiander]

Pull Request (PR) description

Added two empty arrays so the compare object never sees a $nul

This Pull Request (PR) fixes the following issues

• Fixes SqlTraceFlag: Cannot bind argument to parameter 'ReferenceObject' because it is null. #1688

Task list

• [x ] Added an entry to the change log under the Unreleased section of the
  file CHANGELOG.md. Entry should say what was changed and how that
  affects users (if applicable), and reference the issue being resolved
  (if applicable).
• Resource documentation updated in the resource's README.md.
• Resource parameter descriptions updated in schema.mof.
• Comment-based help updated, including parameter descriptions.
• Localization strings updated.
• Examples updated.
• Unit tests updated. See DSC Community Testing Guidelines.
• Integration tests updated (where possible). See DSC Community Testing Guidelines.
• Code changes adheres to DSC Community Style Guidelines.

---

This change is 

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1689 (c250c97) into main (f7676b0) will increase coverage by 0%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@         Coverage Diff          @@
##           main   #1689   +/-   ##
====================================
  Coverage    97%     97%           
====================================
  Files        38      38           
  Lines      6268    6276    +8     
====================================
+ Hits       6112    6120    +8     
  Misses      156     156           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	97% <100%> (+<1%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...SCResources/DSC_SqlTraceFlag/DSC_SqlTraceFlag.psm1	97% <100%> (+<1%)	⬆️

[johlju]

Reviewed 1 of 10 files at r4, 2 of 2 files at r5.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @Fiander)

[Fiander]

euh?
@johlju why are we waiting on me?

i dont see any action to do?

[johlju]

@Fiander I was looking if I could rebase this myself. But I couldn't find a easy way :/ thought I spare you the job. 😄 Could you please rebase this PR against main. So that the CHANGELOG.md is correct, currently it proposes to remove a part of the existing CHANGELOG.

[Fiander]

oke, wil do

[johlju]

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r6.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved

[Fiander]

Damm you are quick :-) did not even have time to give you a heads up

[johlju]

Haha I was actually in Reviewable and saw it was missing a header, and when I was about to comment on it Reviewable refreshed for the new commit you pushes and the header was there 😂

[johlju]

Will probably merge tomorrow because I’m probably in bed when the finishes 😃

[Fiander]

😲 you sleep? I don't have time for that.

[johlju]

@Fiander haha I have noticed the mind works better after some sleep 😉