Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 27, 2023. It is now read-only.

update interface of ClientWriter #1364

Merged

Conversation

wangforthinker
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: allen.wq [email protected]

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR did

Update interface of ClientWriter, add method of Run().

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

NONE.

Ⅲ. Why don't you add test cases (unit test/integration test)? (你真的觉得不需要加测试吗?)

no need.

Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews

@wangforthinker wangforthinker force-pushed the feat/update-clientwriter-interface branch from 1d88ac4 to 872c6e2 Compare May 28, 2020 08:04
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #1364 into master will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1364      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   51.78%   51.80%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         135      135              
  Lines        8803     8803              
==========================================
+ Hits         4559     4560       +1     
  Misses       3866     3866              
+ Partials      378      377       -1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
supernode/daemon/mgr/scheduler/manager.go 22.60% <0.00%> (+0.68%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f1bd6e8...872c6e2. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@lowzj lowzj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@lowzj lowzj merged commit e8a6514 into dragonflyoss:master May 28, 2020
@wangforthinker wangforthinker deleted the feat/update-clientwriter-interface branch May 29, 2020 06:40
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants