Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Annotating libraries with small number of warnings to be AOT safe #72108

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 15, 2022

Conversation

LakshanF
Copy link
Contributor

@LakshanF LakshanF commented Jul 13, 2022

Draft PR to check the viability to make these libraries AOT-compatible with minimal effort

@dotnet-issue-labeler
Copy link

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:

This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, to please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.

@dotnet-issue-labeler
Copy link

I couldn't figure out the best area label to add to this PR. If you have write-permissions please help me learn by adding exactly one area label.

@ghost ghost assigned LakshanF Jul 13, 2022
@LakshanF LakshanF marked this pull request as draft July 13, 2022 16:40
@LakshanF
Copy link
Contributor Author

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@LakshanF
Copy link
Contributor Author

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@LakshanF
Copy link
Contributor Author

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@LakshanF LakshanF marked this pull request as ready for review July 14, 2022 16:38
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants