TensorPrimitives XML docs: MinNumber/ReciprocalSqrt/ReciprocalSqrtEstimate oversights

[delreluca]

While going through the docs for TensorPrimitives I noticed some copy–paste accidents:

1. MinNumber refers to maxima instead of minima
2. ReciprocalSqrt and ReciprocalSqrtEstimate are missing the square root in the explanation of the effective computation

I cross-checked IEEE754:2019 to make sure that the now referenced minimumNumber exists.

Only XML doc comments are changed, no actual code.

[dotnet-policy-service]

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-numerics
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

[delreluca]

@dotnet-policy-service agree

[stephentoub]

Thanks!

[stephentoub]

@jeffhandley, @gewarren, I believe for this library the XML comments are the source of truth. Do we still need to submit a PR separately to dotnet-api-docs? Do we backport this to release/9.0 and then the "right things" happen? Something else?

[stephentoub]

/ba-g comment change only

[jeffhandley]

@jeffhandley, @gewarren, I believe for this library the XML comments are the source of truth. Do we still need to submit a PR separately to dotnet-api-docs? Do we backport this to release/9.0 and then the "right things" happen? Something else?

Tagging @carlossanlop for the answer on this.

[carlossanlop]

Do we still need to submit a PR separately to dotnet-api-docs?

Nope. Not if source of truth is triple slash comments as mentioned.

Do we backport this to release/9.0 and then the "right things" happen?

Yes. This needs to be backported to release/9.0-staging and the fixed docs should start showing up on the next servicing release.

[stephentoub]

/backport to release/9.0-staging

[github-actions]

Started backporting to release/9.0-staging: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/11893607914