You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The public API of ML.NET should have a defined ordering for
feature column name
label column name
weight column name
group id column name
Currently the trainer estimators in ML.NET do not have a defined ordering for the above parameters. We should address this as we finalize the API for V1.0
Here is a proposal for consistent ordering of these parameters for the trainer estimators:
The public API of ML.NET should have a defined ordering for
Currently the trainer estimators in ML.NET do not have a defined ordering for the above parameters. We should address this as we finalize the API for V1.0
Here is a proposal for consistent ordering of these parameters for the trainer estimators:
unsupervised trainer estimators (e.g. KMeansPlusPlusTrainer)
(feature , weight)
supervised trainer estimators: (e.g. LightGbmBinaryTrainer)
(label, feature, weight)
ranking trainer estimators: (e.g. LightGbmRankingTrainer)
(label, feature, groupid, weight)
Related to #2177, #2257, #2660
@Ivanidzo4ka @sfilipi @rogancarr @TomFinley @glebuk
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: