-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 789
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Print ParamArray attribute instead of 'params' #192
Closed
Closed
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3fde68d
Print ParamArray attribute instead of 'params'
dungpa a8972fe
Fix up tests
dungpa adb4fa2
Minor refactoring
dungpa 93bd099
Fix language service unit tests
dungpa e7f654f
Update FSharpQA tests
dungpa 301dfaa
Update test listing
dungpa File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ | ||
// #Regression #NoMT #Printing | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
|
||
#light | ||
|
||
// pretty printing signatures with params arguments | ||
//<Expects status=success>type Heterogeneous =</Expects> | ||
//<Expects status=success> class</Expects> | ||
//<Expects status=success> static member Echo : \[<System.ParamArray>\] args:obj \[\] -> obj \[\]</Expects> | ||
//<Expects status=success> end</Expects> | ||
|
||
type Heterogeneous = | ||
static member Echo([<System.ParamArray>] args: obj[]) = args | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. no newline at eof There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Done |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
used same bound name
path
, use another instead of replacepath
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are subjective opinions on value shadowing. Since the code is moved from another place in the file, I will keep it as is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, that's fine. FWIW there is plenty of shadowing in the compiler in any case
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@dungpa I have not seen that code was moved only.
btw @dsyme about shadowing (asking, like for
<|
on code review ) is it usually ok? or we should avoit it for new code ( not moved code )