Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes around identifier and type mappings for ValuesExpression #33439

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2024

Conversation

roji
Copy link
Member

@roji roji commented Mar 30, 2024

@maumar the identifier fix doesn't have a test for it - not sure I can come up with a test case that doesn't also involve a set operation, which is blocked by other issues (#33410 (comment)).

Closes #33436
Closes #33438

@roji roji requested a review from maumar March 30, 2024 16:06
@maumar
Copy link
Contributor

maumar commented Mar 30, 2024

Test with Union should work. For that we ignore the original identifiers (as long as there were some to begin with) and use the projection itself as identifier. @roji

@roji
Copy link
Member Author

roji commented Mar 30, 2024

@maumar thanks for the tip, makes sense! Pushed the UNION-based test, and some other fixes, should be ready for review.

@roji roji merged commit c89731a into dotnet:main Mar 31, 2024
7 checks passed
@roji roji deleted the InlineCollectionStuff branch March 31, 2024 03:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants