Log warning when credentials used for reverse engineering does not have view definition rights #26776
Conversation
…ave 'VIEW DEFINITION' rights
ErikEJ
changed the title
…ave 'VIEW DEFINITION' rights
| @@ -70,7 +70,8 @@ private enum Id | |||
| ReflexiveConstraintIgnored, | |||
| DuplicateForeignKeyConstraintIgnored, | |||
| ColumnWithoutTypeWarning, | |||
| ForeignKeyReferencesUnknownPrincipalTableWarning | |||
| ForeignKeyReferencesUnknownPrincipalTableWarning, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Line 36 and 37 here looks like an error waiting to happen...
Maybe they should be removed?
| @@ -248,6 +248,10 @@ | |||
| <value>Unable to find a table in the database matching the selected table '{table}'.</value> | |||
| <comment>Warning SqlServerEventId.MissingTableWarning string?</comment> | |||
| </data> | |||
| <data name="LogMissingViewDefinitionRights" xml:space="preserve"> | |||
| <value>Aspects of your schema definition may be missing, as the credentials in use has not been granted 'VIEW DEFINITION' rights.</value> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggestions for phrasing this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could be:
Unable to fully reverse engineer your database, because the credentials used have not been granted 'VIEW DEFINITION' rights for the database.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
cc: @dotnet/efteam for warning message review.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
How about, "The database user has not been granted 'VIEW DEFINITION' rights. Scaffolding requires these rights to construct the Entity Framework model correctly. Without these rights, parts of the scaffolded model may be missing, resulting in incorrect interactions between Entity Framework and the database at runtime."
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, maybe just "parts" iso "the parts"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have updated the message now
|
Thank you @ErikEJ |
ajcvickers
changed the title
fixes #22842