-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add view support to the relational model API #19971
Conversation
new IViewColumn FindColumn([NotNull] string name); | ||
|
||
/// <summary> | ||
/// The view definition or <c>null</c> if this view is not managed by migrations. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interesting if you specify a view definition we will create it for you in migrations hence managed by migrations.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, that's the design...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@smitpatel @ajcvickers @bricelam I've reverted the breaking change to |
Use the new model in the query pipeline Fixes #12846
@@ -411,7 +427,17 @@ public static RelationalTypeMapping GetRelationalTypeMapping([NotNull] this IPro | |||
/// <param name="property"> The property. </param> | |||
/// <returns> The type mapping, or null if none was found. </returns> | |||
[DebuggerStepThrough] | |||
[Obsolete("Use FindRelationalTypeMapping")] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why obsolete?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Renamed
5e9d751
to
8ea444b
Compare
Use the new model in the query pipeline
Fixes #12846