-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Propose relaxed ordering for partial and ref modifiers #8134
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
||
```diff | ||
property_declaration | ||
- : attributes? property_modifier* type member_name property_body | ||
+ : attributes? property_modifier* 'partial'? type member_name property_body |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
reading diffs of diffs can be challenging even in simple cases like this, so consider just reading the old version then the new version to understand what's going on.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Love it.
@jcouv suggested this aspect of the feature could probably wait till after merge to main. I will probably leave this PR open until it's time to do that work (which shouldn't be too long). |
We still want to do this but will be punting impl work on it out to .NET 10. |
Should this go into a separate proposal then? |
Yeah I'll push such a change to this PR when I get the chance. |
dotnet/roslyn#73090
#946
Spec'ing this related small feature as the partial properties speclet said we would do.