-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 510
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update Azure.Provisioning to latest #6390
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
18 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2738bc9
Update Azure.Provisioning to latest
eerhardt d06321c
Rename properties to match new type names.
eerhardt 88c15fb
Add azure dev feed to test configs
eerhardt 4912749
Use IsAccessKeyAuthenticationDisabled property
eerhardt 5c9f739
Update to the latest dev build.
eerhardt 44ee80e
Update to latest version
eerhardt b1b7194
Fix ContainerAppExtensions for new Azure.Provisioning version
eerhardt aeba560
Simplify BicepValueFormattableString
eerhardt 94ffd45
Simplify ReferenceExpression to BicepValue<string> logic
eerhardt 184a67a
Fix Azure Redis test for new property order
eerhardt 100cb4a
Update to latest Azure.Provisioning version.
eerhardt 0adc809
Apply suggestions from code review
eerhardt 2add4c1
Update playground bicep
eerhardt 5e94eca
Fix issue in AspireV8ResourceNamePropertyResolver when resource name …
eerhardt b1760c1
Allow customizing Azure ContainerApp resources with ProvisioningBuild…
eerhardt 9d32d30
Update packages to stable
joperezr ccb1355
Revert test nuget.config changes.
eerhardt 5ffb437
Fix up variable name.
eerhardt File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FYI - @davidfowl. We aren't able to get rid of our
Format
string parsing code from ReferenceExpression. But we are able to use the newBicepStringBuilder
here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was able to simplify the BicepValueFormattableString class. No need for it to inherit from FormattableString.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should be able to if you move this logic into the caller right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can build up the BicepStringBuilder earlier and not have the BicepValueFormattableString at all. But we will still need to parse the
ReferenceExpression.Format
string ourselves.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah yea, ok.