-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 480
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Null is not true, but null is not false #2030
Conversation
/backport to release/8.0-preview3 |
Started backporting to release/8.0-preview3: https://github.com/dotnet/aspire/actions/runs/7736840583 |
@davidfowl backporting to release/8.0-preview3 failed, the patch most likely resulted in conflicts: $ git am --3way --ignore-whitespace --keep-non-patch changes.patch
Applying: Null is not true, but null is not false
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M src/Aspire.Hosting/Dcp/ApplicationExecutor.cs
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging src/Aspire.Hosting/Dcp/ApplicationExecutor.cs
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/Aspire.Hosting/Dcp/ApplicationExecutor.cs
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0001 Null is not true, but null is not false
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
Error: The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 128 Please backport manually! |
@davidfowl an error occurred while backporting to release/8.0-preview3, please check the run log for details! Error: git am failed, most likely due to a merge conflict. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not needed for preview 3 branch, but for main does it make sense to also add tests for this?
I was just discussing this with @JamesNK. To enable testing this component it needs a lot more refactoring. Yes, though we need to do it. |
I think we probably need to start to break |
Simplest fix for this so we can backport to preview 3. A better fix is to avoid making this nullable and just have true and false 😄
Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow