-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 479
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add the ability to keep packages in preview #2541
Comments
What would the versions look like? For 8.0 - |
I don't know about packages themselves, but Dapr's .NET SDK currently marks preview APIs with the Even if the packages are marked as not-preview, it might be worth marking the APIs themselves as experimental to call that out. |
dotnet/runtime does this with https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-dotnet also ships some packages as stable and some as not. I'm not 100% sure how we'd want to handle it. |
I'm pretty sure dotnet/aspnetcore does this today too but not sure if they're using the |
Yup, essentially we just want to make sure that the |
Grep'ing a bit -
Can you name any such package? It would help me to check how they might be doing it. My grep-fu fell short in trying to find that in the aspnetcore repo. |
oops, didn't see this message! |
…able yet - Aspire.Hosting.AWS - OpenAI - EventHubs Part of dotnet#2541
…able yet - Aspire.Hosting.AWS - OpenAI - EventHubs Part of #2541
…able yet (#3707) - Aspire.Hosting.AWS - OpenAI - EventHubs Part of #2541 Co-authored-by: Eric Erhardt <[email protected]>
When we ship for 8.0 GA, there are going to be some Components that shouldn't be shipped as "stable". For example, https://www.nuget.org/packages/Azure.AI.OpenAI/ does not have a stable version yet. If it doesn't have a stable version before we ship for 8.0 GA, we shouldn't (can't?) ship our
Aspire.Azure.AI.OpenAI
component as a stable version.We should have some build infrastructure that allows for specific packages to be built with a preview tag, even when the rest of the packages are "stable".
cc @joperezr @DamianEdwards @sebastienros @radical
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: