Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge relational and regular table docs #1717

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 9, 2019
Merged

Merge relational and regular table docs #1717

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 9, 2019

Conversation

roji
Copy link
Member

@roji roji commented Sep 10, 2019

  • Merged modeling/relational/tables and modeling/relational/default-schema into modeling/included-types and renamed to types-and-tables.
  • Show DataAnnotation/FluentAPI as tabs

Part of #1669

Notes/questions:

  • I removed some backticks from DbSet for now - this seemed to break the text flow. We should probably make a decision on this, probably document in CONTRIBUTING.md
  • We sometimes show code samples as triple-backticks, sometimes as link to the samples, and sometimes both, where the link is in a comment prefixing the triple-backticks section (and isn't actually shown anywhere on the site). We should probably have a general discussion on what we want to do.
  • We currently have a note duplicated in all relational modeling pages (The configuration in this section is applicable to relational databases in general. The extension methods shown here will become available when you install a relational database provider (due to the shared Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Relational package)). As we're merging relational and non-relational docs, it seems OK to remove this note, and to textually call out when documenting a relational-only feature.

@roji roji force-pushed the MergeRelational branch 7 times, most recently from 947b957 to 4bccb9a Compare September 12, 2019 07:43
Copy link
Contributor

@divega divega left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good. Some comments.

entity-framework/core/modeling/types-and-tables.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
entity-framework/core/modeling/types-and-tables.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
entity-framework/core/modeling/types-and-tables.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
entity-framework/core/modeling/types-and-tables.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
entity-framework/core/modeling/types-and-tables.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
entity-framework/core/modeling/types-and-tables.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
entity-framework/core/modeling/types-and-tables.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ajcvickers
Copy link
Member

@roji What's the state here? There is a lot of conversation above between you and Diego; do these still need to be resolved?

@roji
Copy link
Member Author

roji commented Nov 5, 2019

Yep, I'm planning to pick this up again now that we're done with 3.1. It would be good to get another opinion on the state of the PR as-is before I do.

@ajcvickers ajcvickers self-requested a review November 8, 2019 19:10
@roji roji force-pushed the MergeRelational branch 5 times, most recently from d67c08a to ba46584 Compare December 3, 2019 14:34
@roji
Copy link
Member Author

roji commented Dec 3, 2019

@ajcvickers (and @aspnet/efteam in general) I rebased this and did some minor tweaks, but otherwise left as-is. Take a look at Diego's comments and tell me what you think.

Once we establish how we want it to be I'll go and do the same to the rest of the modeling docs.

@roji
Copy link
Member Author

roji commented Dec 6, 2019

Pushed some changes.

@roji roji force-pushed the MergeRelational branch 2 times, most recently from 23497ad to 8744336 Compare December 9, 2019 23:27
* Merged modeling/relational/tables and modeling/relational/default-schema
  into modeling/included-types and renamed to types-and-tables.
* Show DataAnnotation/FluentAPI as tabs

Part of #1669
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants