Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hosting Docs #791

Closed
wants to merge 17 commits into from
Closed

Hosting Docs #791

wants to merge 17 commits into from

Conversation

shirhatti
Copy link
Contributor

Adresses part of #58

  • Servicing
  • Directory Structure
  • Http PlatformHandler
  • Isolation by AppPools

@shirhatti
Copy link
Contributor Author

@blowdart Could you have a look?

@blowdart
Copy link
Contributor

Is it built in a branch anywhere or do I need to do it myself?

@shirhatti
Copy link
Contributor Author

Try this

.. toctree::
:titlesonly:

servicing
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The order is strange. It needs an introduction topic, then I'd suggest Installing Platform Handler, followed by Directory Structure, App Pools then Servicing.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@blowdart Does this seem more reasonable shirhatti@f251c6d ?

@@ -1,9 +1,6 @@
Dependency Injection and Controllers
====================================

.. _dependency-injection-controllers:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this change in this PR?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To fix the Travis build. The change was already made upstream. It will go away from my diff when I rebase

@shirhatti
Copy link
Contributor Author

@blowdart Based on discussion earlier today, I've added content for setting up data protection in shared hosting scenarios. (Haven't covered web farms yet). Could you have a look at c3b1a9b?


By `Sourabh Shirhatti`

The hosting docs provide an overview of the features on ASP.NET 5. Hosters who offer ASP.NET hosting will be able to use the setup and configuration recommendations to integrate ASP.NET 5 into their hosting solution. This document should also serve as a guide for any enviroment where multiple discrete users will be running web sites on a single server or web farm.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No they don't. "provide an overview of how to host ASP.NET 5", not "of the features on"

@shirhatti
Copy link
Contributor Author

@blowdart Can you review the X.509 section?

Using X.509 Certificates
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

A developer can consume the Data Protection APIs to encrypt data at rest using a X.509 certificate. To enable this scenario, the hoster needs to allow a user to upload a certificate and correctly protect them. Import the certificate into the **Personal** Directory under the **Local Computer** account using **mmc.exe**. To grant the application access to the certificate,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Personal directory? It's not a directory, It's a certificate store.

@danroth27
Copy link
Member

@Erikre Please review.

@Rick-Anderson
Copy link
Contributor

:shipit:


To grant the IIS worker process access to your application, you will need to modify the Access Control List (ACL) for the the directory containing your application.

1. Open Windows Explorer and naviagate to the directory.
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

s/naviagate/navigate/

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for catching that

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants