Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Explore
By company size
By use case
By industry
View all solutions
Topics
- AI
- DevOps
- Security
- Software Development
- View all
Explore
- GitHub Sponsors
  Fund open source developers
- The ReadME Project
  GitHub community articles
Repositories
- Enterprise platform
  AI-powered developer platform
Available add-ons
Pricing

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Search

Clear

Search syntax tips

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Include my email address so I can be contacted

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Name

Query

To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.

You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.

Dismiss alert

dotansimha / graphql-code-generator Public

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings
Fork 1.3k
Star 10.9k

Code
Issues 527
Pull requests 92
Discussions
Actions
Security
Insights

Additional navigation options

Code
Issues
Pull requests
Discussions
Actions
Security
Insights

Duplicated type when fields are named the same as operation types#1369

Merged

kamilkisiela merged 3 commits intomasterdotansimha/graphql-code-generator:masterfrom fix/operation-field-name-conflictsdotansimha/graphql-code-generator:fix/operation-field-name-conflictsCopy head branch name to clipboard

Feb 27, 2019

+245-239

Conversation Commits3 (3)Checks Files changed

Commits

Commits on Feb 27, 2019

Avoid duplicates - each type name should be unique, including operation types
kamilkisiela
committed
Generate examples
kamilkisiela
committed
Apply suggestions from code review
kamilkisiela
authored

Footer

© 2024 GitHub, Inc.

Footer navigation

Terms
Privacy
Security
Status
Docs
Contact

You can’t perform that action at this time.