Collection cache key is built differently on read than on write #1552
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This one's a quick bugfix that would be better if we could refactor key building logic inside the
\Doctrine\ORM\Cache
implementations, but that would be a (albeit small) BC break in its current API.I intentionally named the refactored protected method exactly as its named in
\Doctrine\ORM\DefaultCache
.Testing this proved harder than what it's worth. I'm actually patching this in userland, and you'll find the bug and correction pretty obvious if you look at both the modified class and
\Doctrine\ORM\DefaultCache
, so I hope we can merge this one and maybe work on a full test suite for all of the Persister strategies.Cheers!