Linting tidy-ups #1582
Merged
Linting tidy-ups #1582
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Justin Chadwell <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Justin Chadwell <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Justin Chadwell <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds two new linting rules, gosec (to catch potential security issues, similar to moby/buildkit#3224), and forbidigo (to catch use of
fmt.Errorf, similar to moby/buildkit#3305).The gosec fixups did catch a couple of loop reference issues in the bake code, where we continued looping after capturing a reference from the loop - which would invalidate that reference. @crazy-max can you confirm these look alright to you now?