Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Windows Server Core version 1903 aka May 2019 Update. #289

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

ob1dev
Copy link

@ob1dev ob1dev commented Jul 9, 2019

Adding support for Windows Server Core version 1903 aka May 2019 Update.

@tianon
Copy link
Member

tianon commented Jul 9, 2019

We don't currently have a place for these to build, unfortunately (we currently use a Windows Server 2019 VM which is nice because it can actually be updated properly, but has the downside that semi-annual releases like 1903 don't get included). 😞

@drpebcak
Copy link

This would be nice to have... Any idea what is going to happen with Windows support going forward?

@tianon
Copy link
Member

tianon commented Aug 15, 2019

These semi-annual releases are honestly a huge pain for us given that they require building on said semi-annual release (which is a pain to run/manage) or Windows 10 (which we don't have a license to run in our current platform).

Throwing out the big dreams, I'd love to see the Windows kernel version mismatch not matter anymore, but I realize that's an architectural nightmare for the Windows folks. 😞

@drpebcak
Copy link

Well, in 3 more months there will be another one. Is there anything that can be done to help with this? In the meantime, I've just forked this repo and applied the patch to build my own, but long-term it would be nice to have this in the upstream.

What platform are you using that you don't have an 1903 image available to spin up real quick for builds? What is the pain point for you guys to spin that up for a build?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants