Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove the askama_iron integration #527

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 5, 2021
Merged

Remove the askama_iron integration #527

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 5, 2021

Conversation

djc
Copy link
Owner

@djc djc commented Aug 5, 2021

This web framework seems not to have been updated for quite a while,
and its current version appears to depend on vulnerable crates.
Remove it for now. If someone wants to fix up Iron upstream and
reinstate this, I'd be happy to review your PR.

This web framework seems not to have been updated for quite a while,
and its current version appears to depend on vulnerable crates.
Remove it for now. If someone wants to fix up Iron upstream and
reinstate this, I'd be happy to review your PR.
Copy link
Collaborator

@vallentin vallentin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense. Should the release be yanked?

@djc djc merged commit 23df4c5 into main Aug 5, 2021
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the rm-iron branch August 5, 2021 11:16
@djc
Copy link
Owner Author

djc commented Aug 5, 2021

I don't think so. Anyone using Iron is already vulnerable, and it would probably be useful if askama_iron stays working with Iron 0.6.2 -- we just don't have to maintain it going forward.

@vallentin
Copy link
Collaborator

Yeah, understandable. I was just checking :)

djc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2022
Issue #527 removed the askama_iron package, but not the integration if
someone uses askama_derive's feature with "iron".

The old askama_iron crate uses askama v0.10, so it will still work.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants