-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 386
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Configurable job timeout #906
Configurable job timeout #906
Conversation
if jobTimeout != "" { | ||
t, err := time.ParseDuration(jobTimeout) | ||
if err != nil { | ||
return nil, errors.New("shell: Error parsing job timeout") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
At this point, the job has already started. If the timeout is misconfigured, any output from the job will be lost and I suspect it will be unclear to the user whether the job did or did not run.
slowTimer := time.AfterFunc(t, func() { | ||
j := fmt.Sprintf("shell: Job '%s' execution time exceeding defined timeout %v. Killing job.", command, t) | ||
log.Print(j) | ||
_, err := output.Write([]byte(j)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Adding the message to the process output before it is killed, could lead to:
- output from the process being written in the output buffer after the message but before termination, which can be confusing
- the log containing a message suggesting it is killed, even though it wasn't, if killing failed for some reason.
Instead, I suggest adding a (different) message after the process has actually terminated. In this case you can also account for any truncation of the output buffer to prevent the message form being lost.
Thank you for a review. I've reworked a feature. Please take a look, again. Thanks! |
return fmt.Errorf("Error parsing job timeout value") | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great! Would you mind creating a test in api_test.go for this validation, analoguous to the other validation tests?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sure
|
||
// Warn if buffer is overritten | ||
// Warn if buffer is ovewritten |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You made a typo correcting the typo ;D
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lol :)
slowTimer := time.AfterFunc(jt, func() { | ||
err = cmd.Process.Kill() | ||
if err != nil { | ||
jobTimeoutMessage = fmt.Sprintf("shell: Job '%s' execution time exceeding defined timeout %v. SIGKILL returned error. Job probably was not killed", command, jt) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"Job probably was not killed" - the probability of this is debatable.
Errors returned can include e.g. Process Done.
In order to prevent digging deep to find out whether it was actually killed or not (on several platforms), maybe just say "Job may not have been killed".
err = cmd.Start() | ||
if err != nil { | ||
return nil, err | ||
} | ||
|
||
// Warn if buffer is overritten | ||
var jobTimeoutMessage string | ||
var jobWasKilled bool |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The jobWasKilled
value actually signifies something different. I suggest renaming it to jobTimedOut
, so it is in line with jobTimeoutMessage
.
Thanks :) here's new commit. P.S. btw, tests were failing with this one:
|
Yes, that happens sometimes. It is due to randomness. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great work here @yvanoers, thank you!
Thanks @Victorcoder , but let's not forget @andreygolev 's contribution, he did the work! |
var jobTimeoutMessage string | ||
var jobTimedOut bool | ||
|
||
slowTimer := time.AfterFunc(jt, func() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just realized that this will be 0s in case there is no timeout set. There should not be timeout when not specifying a timeout.
Could you please open a new PR with the change @andreygolev?
And yes! sorry for my fast typing, thanks for the work here @andreygolev of course!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, sure! :)
Sometimes jobs may stuck by any reason, and we expect them to finish in a specified time.
Default behaviour is not do anything.