Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix /datasets?filter to select across namespaces #3359
Fix /datasets?filter to select across namespaces #3359
Changes from 4 commits
e58ecbb
716c417
f1e4626
e32fd47
2256c05
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The effect of this is conditional upon
DEBUG
-level logging being enabled, right? It would be nice if "debug" appeared in its name....OK, having read further, I see that you've enhanced this to work for non-
DEBUG
-level; in that case, I humbly request that you explicitly include the third argument here, which will make it more obvious to the reader that it's a "debug thing".There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a debug thing until its not. The default behavior of this method hasn't changed. I just extended it to allow externally overriding to
info
for testing. I didn't see any point in renaming, and adding the default argument here is redundant.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Adding the default argument here makes it clear to the reader that the function is intended to be active only for debugging (otherwise, this behavior is implicit, and the concerned reader has to go find the definition of
dump_query()
to figure that out). (We can keep the argument's default value for compatibility with other, existing code; but it would be good from a code-as-documentation perspective to supply the value explicitly here.)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Alternately,
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, but I like the explicit
if
better here than the local variable, especially when I'm pretty sureblack
wouldn't let me put it on one line anyway.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you really like it better, that's fine. (Myself, I prefer a common call point with conditional data over multiple conditional call points.) However, I checked with Mr. Black before I posted it, and he said it was fine.