-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 108
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enable OIDC redirect in dashboard #3233
Merged
npalaska
merged 6 commits into
distributed-system-analysis:openid-connect
from
npalaska:pbench_1072
Feb 25, 2023
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
31de196
Enable OIDC redirect in dashboard
npalaska db6499c
update the buttons on UI
npalaska 00d41a9
add try-catch, sync with latest server endpoints api changes
npalaska d32e20b
we dont need client secret when redirecting
npalaska de04230
refactor and remove redux state mutation
npalaska 852762e
Merge branch 'openid-connect' into pbench_1072
npalaska File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This feels funny: it says "if there is an
error.response
then there must be anerror.response.data
which might contain a message which we can use for the title (but, if it doesn't, then use atitle
ofundefined
); otherwise, use a title oferror.message
(or maybeundefined
). That's a lot ofundefined
's....In any case, it seems like what we want is something more like this:
That is, if our
error.response
contains adata
which contains amessage
, then use that message; otherwise, if ourerror
contains amessage
then use thatmessage
; otherwise, fall back to a constant message.(The current code is assuming that
error.response
contains adata
which may or may not contain amessage
...are we sure it contains adata
?...are we sure thatdata
might not contain amessage
?)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, this is a good suggestion but I will address it in #3250, I need to do some rework there anyway.