Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Default to Python 3.9 for unit tests #2913

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 22, 2022

Conversation

portante
Copy link
Member

Test Python 3.6 as well for the agent side only.

Test Python 3.6 as well for the agent side only.
@portante portante added Agent Server Code Infrastructure Unit tests packaging Issues related to software packaging Backport PRs with this label should be considered for back porting to previous release branches labels Jun 22, 2022
@portante portante added this to the v0.72 milestone Jun 22, 2022
@portante portante self-assigned this Jun 22, 2022
jenkins/Pipeline.gy Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@npalaska npalaska left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So is the default only for the server unit tests?

Copy link
Member

@webbnh webbnh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@dbutenhof dbutenhof merged commit 9997558 into distributed-system-analysis:main Jun 22, 2022
@portante portante removed the Backport PRs with this label should be considered for back porting to previous release branches label Jun 23, 2022
portante added a commit to portante/pbench that referenced this pull request Jun 23, 2022
Back-port of PR distributed-system-analysis#2913 (commit 9997558).

Test Python 3.6 as well for the agent side only.
portante added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2022
Back-port of PR #2913 (commit 9997558).

Test Python 3.6 as well for the agent side only.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants