feat(azure): create azure monitor workspace #1485
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new module for monitoring workspace resources in Azure using Bicep. It adds a Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Warning Rate limit exceeded@arealmaas has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 13 minutes and 7 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.azure/infrastructure/main.bicep (1)
128-138: Consider documenting integration points and security configurations.Since this monitor workspace is intended for Prometheus metrics:
Integration Documentation:
- Document how other services should be configured to send metrics
- Include Prometheus endpoint information and scraping configuration
- Consider adding these details to the repository's documentation
Security Considerations:
- Ensure the private endpoint is properly configured in the monitor-workspace module
- Verify network security group rules allow necessary metric collection traffic
- Consider documenting the network security requirements
Monitoring Strategy:
- Consider defining standard metric naming conventions
- Plan for metric retention policies and scaling considerations
.azure/modules/vnet/main.bicep (1)
Line range hint
1-418: Consider implementing a comprehensive security review across all NSGsI notice that all NSGs in this file have similarly permissive configurations with TODO comments about restricting ports. Consider:
- Implementing a security baseline for all NSGs
- Using service tags where applicable (e.g., 'AzureMonitor', 'AzureContainerApps')
- Documenting required ports and protocols for each service
- Setting up network watcher flow logs for monitoring
Would you like assistance in creating a security baseline template for all NSGs in this file?
🧰 Tools
🪛 checkov
[HIGH] 266-302: Ensure that RDP access is restricted from the internet
(CKV_AZURE_9)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.azure/infrastructure/main.bicep(1 hunks).azure/modules/monitor-workspace/main.bicep(1 hunks).azure/modules/vnet/main.bicep(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 checkov
.azure/modules/vnet/main.bicep
[HIGH] 266-302: Ensure that RDP access is restricted from the internet
(CKV_AZURE_9)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.azure/infrastructure/main.bicep (1)
128-138: Verify network dependencies and consider adding module outputs.
The module integration looks good, but there are a few considerations:
- Ensure the referenced
vnet.outputs.monitorSubnetIdis properly defined in the vnet module. - Consider exposing key outputs from the monitor workspace (e.g., workspace ID, ingestion endpoints) that might be needed by other resources or for documentation.
Let's verify the vnet module outputs:
✅ Verification successful
Network dependencies are properly configured
The verification confirms that:
- The vnet module correctly defines both required outputs:
monitorSubnetIdis exposed through a dedicated outputvirtualNetworkIdis properly exposed
- The monitor subnet is properly configured with:
- Dedicated address space: '10.0.6.0/24'
- Associated monitor NSG
- Required network policies for private endpoints
Additionally, the monitor-workspace module correctly utilizes these dependencies for setting up the private endpoint configuration.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the vnet module outputs and monitor subnet configuration
# Check if the vnet module defines the required outputs
rg "outputs\.monitorSubnetId|outputs\.virtualNetworkId" "../modules/vnet/main.bicep"
# Look for monitor subnet and NSG configuration
rg "monitorSubnet|monitorNSG" "../modules/vnet/main.bicep"
Length of output: 277
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first find the correct path to the vnet module
fd "main.bicep" .azure/modules
# Then check the content of any vnet-related bicep files
fd "vnet.*\.bicep" .azure/modules --exec cat {}
Length of output: 514
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the content of the vnet module
cat .azure/modules/vnet/main.bicep
# Also check the monitor workspace module to understand the expected inputs
cat .azure/modules/monitor-workspace/main.bicep
Length of output: 13862
.azure/modules/vnet/main.bicep (2)
375-385: LGTM: Monitor subnet configuration is appropriate
The subnet configuration is correctly set up with:
- Non-overlapping address space
- Disabled private endpoint policies (required for private endpoints)
- Enabled private link service policies
414-418: LGTM: Monitor subnet ID output follows established pattern
The output is correctly defined using the resourceId function and follows the same pattern as other subnet ID outputs in the file.
.azure/modules/monitor-workspace/main.bicep (3)
16-21: Confirm 'publicNetworkAccess' setting is appropriate
Setting publicNetworkAccess to 'Disabled' for monitorWorkspace enhances security by preventing public access. Ensure that this aligns with your accessibility requirements and that necessary private connectivity is established.
51-59: Validate the default domain for the private DNS zone
In the privateDnsZone module, the defaultDomain is constructed as 'privatelink.${location}.prometheus.monitor.azure.com'. Ensure that this domain is correct and matches the expected domain for the Azure Monitor Prometheus endpoint in the specified region.
Run the following script to verify the constructed domain:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the constructed default domain is valid for the Azure Monitor Prometheus endpoint.
# Output the constructed domain for manual verification.
echo "privatelink.${location}.prometheus.monitor.azure.com"
# Optional: Search for official documentation or existing configurations that match this domain pattern.28-49:
Verify 'groupIds' and private endpoint configuration
Ensure that 'prometheusMetrics' is the correct groupId for the private link service connection to monitorWorkspace. Incorrect groupIds may lead to connectivity issues.
Run the following script to confirm that 'prometheusMetrics' is a valid groupId:
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.azure/modules/vnet/main.bicep (2)
266-302: Security configuration improvements for Monitor NSGGood implementation of restricted NSG rules for Azure Monitor. The configuration follows security best practices by:
- Limiting to TCP protocol and port 443
- Restricting traffic to/from Azure Monitor service
Consider these additional improvements:
- Use different priorities for inbound and outbound rules to avoid potential conflicts
- Add explicit deny rules for other traffic types
resource monitorNSG 'Microsoft.Network/networkSecurityGroups@2024-03-01' = { name: '${namePrefix}-monitor-nsg' location: location properties: { securityRules: [ { name: 'AllowAzureMonitorInbound' // ... existing properties ... priority: 120 } { name: 'AllowAzureMonitorOutbound' // ... existing properties ... - priority: 120 + priority: 130 } + { + name: 'DenyAllInbound' + type: 'Microsoft.Network/networkSecurityGroups/securityRules' + properties: { + protocol: '*' + sourcePortRange: '*' + destinationPortRange: '*' + sourceAddressPrefix: '*' + destinationAddressPrefix: '*' + access: 'Deny' + priority: 4096 + direction: 'Inbound' + } + } + { + name: 'DenyAllOutbound' + type: 'Microsoft.Network/networkSecurityGroups/securityRules' + properties: { + protocol: '*' + sourcePortRange: '*' + destinationPortRange: '*' + sourceAddressPrefix: '*' + destinationAddressPrefix: '*' + access: 'Deny' + priority: 4096 + direction: 'Outbound' + } + } ] } }
Line range hint
1-418: Consider comprehensive NSG security reviewWhile the monitor NSG follows security best practices, other NSGs in the file have TODO comments about port restrictions and use overly permissive rules. Consider:
- Applying similar security restrictions to other NSGs
- Creating a tracking issue for comprehensive NSG security review
- Documenting NSG security requirements
Would you like me to:
- Generate secured configurations for other NSGs?
- Create a GitHub issue to track the comprehensive NSG security review?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.azure/modules/vnet/main.bicep(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.azure/modules/vnet/main.bicep (2)
414-418: LGTM: Monitor subnet output follows existing patterns
The output declaration is consistent with other subnet ID outputs in the file.
375-385: LGTM: Monitor subnet configuration follows best practices
The subnet configuration is well-structured with:
- Appropriate CIDR block allocation (10.0.6.0/24)
- Correct private endpoint and service policies
- Proper NSG association
Verify address space availability:
✅ Verification successful
Monitor subnet configuration is correctly allocated within the VNet address space
The monitor subnet configuration (10.0.6.0/24) is properly allocated within the VNet's address space (10.0.0.0/16) and doesn't conflict with other subnet allocations:
- default: 10.0.0.0/24
- postgresql: 10.0.1.0/24
- containerAppEnv: 10.0.2.0/23
- serviceBus: 10.0.4.0/24
- redis: 10.0.5.0/24
- monitor: 10.0.6.0/24
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential address space conflicts
# Look for other address space allocations in the codebase
rg "addressPrefix.*10\.0\.[0-9]+\.0/[0-9]+" -A 1
Length of output: 50
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for address prefixes in bicep files
fd -e bicep -x cat {} | grep -A 1 "addressPrefix.*10\."
Length of output: 59
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's look at the entire vnet module to understand the address space allocation
cat .azure/modules/vnet/main.bicep
Length of output: 11865
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [1.36.0](v1.35.0...v1.36.0) (2024-11-19) ### Features * **azure:** create azure monitor workspace ([#1485](#1485)) ([da0aa8f](da0aa8f)) ### Bug Fixes * **app:** Error details missing when user type is unknown ([#1493](#1493)) ([9fbd2cf](9fbd2cf)) * **azure:** enable public access for azure monitor ([#1496](#1496)) ([b0d5794](b0d5794)) * **azure:** ensure monitor workspace is reachable ([#1494](#1494)) ([dc7fc1f](dc7fc1f)) * **webapi:** Require base service provider scope on search endpoint ([#1476](#1476)) ([8c41f3d](8c41f3d)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
<!--- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ## Description <!--- Describe your changes in detail --> Related to #1485 ## Related Issue(s) - #1463 ## Verification - [ ] **Your** code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [ ] Manual testing done (required) - [ ] Relevant automated test added (if you find this hard, leave it and we'll help out) ## Documentation - [ ] Documentation is updated (either in `docs`-directory, Altinnpedia or a separate linked PR in [altinn-studio-docs.](https://github.com/Altinn/altinn-studio-docs), if applicable) <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit ## Release Notes - **New Features** - Introduced a new module for managing container app identities. - Enhanced monitoring configurations with new parameters for Application Insights and metrics ingestion. - Added functionality for assigning Monitoring Metrics Publisher roles to specified identities. - Introduced new resources for data collection endpoints and rules for improved monitoring capabilities. - **Improvements** - Updated existing modules to support new identity and monitoring features, enhancing overall deployment capabilities. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Description
Adds an azure monitor workspace which will enable us to send metrics to Prometheus
Related Issue(s)
Verification
Documentation
docs-directory, Altinnpedia or a separate linked PR in altinn-studio-docs., if applicable)Summary by CodeRabbit