-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 89
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Host docker image on dockerhub #696
Comments
The image is actually being built and hosted in ghrc with each release. You
don't have to build it from scratch if you don't want :)
El jue., 25 abr. 2024 9:23 p. m., Mathias Vanden Auweele <
***@***.***> escribió:
… *Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.*
I would like to use the latest version of Widoco in a Docker container
without having to build the image myself.
*Describe the solution you'd like*
Automatic build and deploy of the docker image on Dockerhub using github
actions.
*Describe alternatives you've considered*
NA
*Additional context*
I can help you with this if you would like. I've already done something
similar for sparql-anything: SPARQL-Anything/sparql.anything#404
<SPARQL-Anything/sparql.anything#404>
I will create a merge request with the necessary configuration to be added
to the .github folder.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#696>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AALTIGR6NKLTALPCALZY4ITY7FJ3JAVCNFSM6AAAAABGZPLDKOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGI3DIMZTGQ4DMNQ>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
See https://github.com/dgarijo/Widoco/pkgs/container/widoco
|
Oh ok... I was so happy that I thought I could help you :) Ok... never mind then. I will close the pull request. Great job by the way :D |
Thanks for your effort @MathiasVDA. I may still consider your PR to have the docker image in 2 image registries. The reason why we did not go for DockerHub is that in the last years they started requiring upgrading your account even for Open Source projects, plus threatening on removing older images if they were not downloaded enough. They have gone back on those decisions for now, but you never know. |
Yes indeed, Docker has made some bad decisions and I understand your reasoning. It's actually my fault to only look on dockerhub for the official image instead of on other repositories. I only saw the mention of building the image yourself in the readme file and I didn't look at the package section of the github page. The PR is still there so feel free to use it whenever you like :) |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I would like to use the latest version of Widoco in a Docker container without having to build the image myself.
Describe the solution you'd like
Automatic build and deploy of the docker image on Dockerhub using github actions.
Describe alternatives you've considered
NA
Additional context
I can help you with this if you would like. I've already done something similar for sparql-anything: SPARQL-Anything/sparql.anything#404
I will create a merge request with the necessary configuration to be added to the .github folder.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: