Include reference section through config.properties file or any CLI option

[Janakiram916]

It is certain that, introducing a reference section and providing necessary information through the WIDOCO interface tool is possible (As indicated in the below image. A potential solution is to load the 'reference.html' file into the reference section.).

Upon transitioning to the Command Line Interface (CLI) and the 'config.properties' option, we discovered the absence of any supported configuration key or CLI option for this purpose.

I am curious as to why this option is not available in either the 'config.properties' file or as a CLI option. Perhaps I have overlooked something?

Any support or guidance on this matter would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks & Regards,
Janakiram

[dgarijo]

Being honest, I did not add it probably because I did not need it and did not think anyone would need it :)
Now I see I was wrong.

[arrascue]

With the option -getOntologyMetadata, the Reference is generated in the documentation as follows:

It seems the section is generated, but it is not clear from which predicate in the ontology it comes from.

[dgarijo]

It shouldn't get anything from ontology metadata for the references... El jue., 23 nov. 2023 9:16 p. m., arrascue ***@***.***> escribió:

…

With the option -getOntologyMetadata, the Reference is generated in the documentation as follows: [image: image] <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/22982088/285300611-f43f7554-ee3d-4355-8101-92930fe1985e.png> It seems the section is generated, but it is not clear from which predicate in the ontology it comes from. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#648 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AALTIGX2FVTZVFB4W6XYRHTYF6VJJAVCNFSM6AAAAAA7YACA6KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMRUHA3TENJUHA> . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[Janakiram916]

Being honest, I did not add it probably because I did not need it and did not think anyone would need it :)
Now I see I was wrong.

Thank you for the response. I truly appreciate your acknowledgment of the importance of this feature. I'm optimistic that there are others who share our perspective and eagerly anticipate for this feature. I am looking forward to it.

[meandor]

Hey,
we would also greatly benefit from this, @dgarijo how can we prioritise this feature up?

[dgarijo]

It should not be a lot of work. I'll try to include it in the next release.

[dgarijo]

Ok, I added a fix for this in the develop branch. Will do another release this week.

[arrascue]

Thanks a lot @dgarijo!