-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 89
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
If a property has an union domain, it won't appear in the domain of the respective classes #379
Comments
This would be a great (and needed) feature for my use case. Is there a plan or priority put to implement it? |
Hi @vtoure, |
Ontology to test this out: http://id.e-science.pl/ontologies/azonOnto.ttl |
I opened a PR to fix this, :) I would appreciate it if it can be in the next release since I needed to add a custom temp fix to my project. How can I help to do so ? |
Thanks @Murloc6 !! |
Fixed in #679, I just need to build a test to verify everything works :) |
For example:
name is a property and its domain is (Person or Dog).
the name property will appear with 2 domains listed: Person or Dog.
However in "Person" it won't appear in the "is in domain of" field. Technically speaking it is correct because the domain is the union. But in practice, the documentation should show the property as "in domain" of both classes. (Or maybe with a remark stating that is part of a union domain).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: