feat: add Octomind integration to GitHub Actions workflows #67
Conversation
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request introduces integration with Octomind for automated E2E testing of preview deployments, adds a new preview deployment workflow, and enhances the production deployment workflow with environment selection, concurrency control, caching, and improved status reporting. Sequence diagram for PR Preview Deployment and E2E TestingsequenceDiagram
participant PR as Pull Request
participant GH as GitHub Actions
participant Pages as GitHub Pages
participant Octomind as Octomind E2E Tests
PR->>GH: Open/Update PR
GH->>GH: Run Quality Checks
GH->>GH: Build Preview
GH->>Pages: Deploy Preview
GH->>PR: Comment Preview URL
GH->>Octomind: Trigger E2E Tests
Octomind-->>GH: Test Results
GH->>PR: Comment Test Status
Sequence diagram for Enhanced Production DeploymentsequenceDiagram
participant Dev as Developer
participant GH as GitHub Actions
participant Pages as GitHub Pages
Dev->>GH: Push to main/Manual trigger
GH->>GH: Validate Production Build
GH->>GH: Run Tests
GH->>GH: Cache Build
GH->>Pages: Deploy to Production
alt deployment fails
GH->>GH: Create Issue
end
GH->>GH: Update Deployment Status
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @aliakbar-deriv - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Consider removing
continue-on-error: truefor lint and type checking steps in preview-deploy.yml to ensure code quality issues are caught early - For consistency and reliability in CI/CD environments, use
npm ciinstead ofnpm installacross all workflows
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟡 Testing: 1 issue found
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
AI Code Review
🔴 BUGS & LOGICAL ISSUES:
-
Environment URL May Not Resolve Properly
• Issue Description: The “environment” block in the deploy job references “steps.deployment.outputs.page_url” before the “Deploy to GitHub Pages” step (id: deployment) has actually set that output. In GitHub Actions, environment URLs do not automatically update retroactively if the referenced step fails, is skipped, or does not set the output correctly.
• Potential Impacts: The environment URL on GitHub may show as empty or stale if the “Deploy to GitHub Pages” step is never invoked or fails before creating its outputs.
• Reproduction Scenarios:
– A push triggers the deploy job, but “Deploy to GitHub Pages” is skipped or fails. The environment block tries to set the URL from a step output that does not exist.
– The job is canceled early but still attempts to assign environment URLs from incomplete steps.
• Fix Implementation (Example):- Option A: Move the environment section’s URL reference after the deploy step, or dynamically update the environment URL using a GitHub CLI or REST call if the deploy step succeeds.
- Option B: Use safe-guard checks to ensure the step output is available before referencing it:
┌─────────────────────────────
│ - name: Set Environment URL
│ if: steps.deployment.outcome == 'success'
│ run: gh api
│ -X POST
│ /repos/${{ github.repository }}/environments/${{ github.event.inputs.environment }}
│ -f environment=url="${{ steps.deployment.outputs.page_url }}"
└─────────────────────────────
-
createDeploymentStatus References Possibly Nonexistent Deployment
• Issue Description: In “Create Deployment Status” (actions/github-script@v6), the script uses “context.payload.deployment?.id” and “steps.deployment.outcome.” If the “Deploy to GitHub Pages” step failed or was skipped, these fields may be null/undefined.
• Potential Impacts: The createDeploymentStatus step may throw errors (or silently fail) if no valid deployment object exists.
• Reproduction Scenarios:
– The “Deploy to GitHub Pages” step never runs because a prior step (e.g., the build) fails.
– The job is canceled mid-deployment, so “steps.deployment” does not produce outputs.
• Fix Implementation (Example):- Add a condition to ensure the deployment step ran successfully:
┌─────────────────────────────
│ - name: Create Deployment Status
│ if: always() && steps.deployment.outcome == 'success'
│ uses: actions/github-script@v6
│ with:
│ script: |
│ // only proceed if we have a valid deployment
│ if (!context.payload.deployment?.id) {
│ core.warning("No valid deployment to update.");
│ return;
│ }
│ // then create the status
└─────────────────────────────
- Add a condition to ensure the deployment step ran successfully:
-
Potential Parallel Deployment Race Condition
• Issue Description: The concurrency group is set to “pages” with “cancel-in-progress: false” for production. This means multiple commits pushed in quick succession can trigger parallel deployments, possibly clobbering each other or resulting in out-of-order release artifacts.
• Potential Impacts: Production systems could receive incomplete or older builds if multiple concurrent workflows finish in an unexpected order.
• Reproduction Scenarios:
– Two quick successive pushes to main cause simultaneous deployments. The second deployment finishes first, then the first deployment overwrites it upon completion.
• Fix Implementation (Example):- Re-enable cancel-in-progress for production or assign a dedicated concurrency group:
┌─────────────────────────────
│ concurrency:
│ group: "production-deploy-${{ github.run_id }}"
│ cancel-in-progress: true
└───────────────────────────── - Alternatively, if deliberate, document that multiple deployments in parallel are intended and handle the ordering in your environment logic.
- Re-enable cancel-in-progress for production or assign a dedicated concurrency group:
🟡 RELIABILITY CONCERNS:
-
Missing Validation on environment Input
• Edge Cases Identified: Although “environment” is a choice in workflow_dispatch with “production”/“staging,” direct pushes (without a dispatch event) default to “production.” If an invalid environment input somehow sneaks through, it is coerced to “production” by the “|| 'production'” fallback.
• Potential Failure Scenarios: The job might silently deploy to production when the user intended something else.
• Mitigation Steps:
– Rely on the “choice” type to reject invalid inputs when triggered via workflow_dispatch.
– Add a final validation step in the “validate” job, e.g.:
┌─────────────────────────────
│ - name: Validate environment input
│ run: |
│ if [[ "${{ github.event.inputs.environment }}" != "production" &&
│ "${{ github.event.inputs.environment }}" != "staging" ]]; then
│ echo "Invalid environment input. Aborting."
│ exit 1
│ fi
└───────────────────────────── -
Cache Key Collisions
• Potential Failure Scenarios: Using “${{ runner.os }}-prod-${{ env.cache-name }}-${{ hashFiles('/package-lock.json') }}” could collide if the environment setup or dependencies differ across branches, though it is usually safe. If collisions occur, an outdated cache might cause builds to fail.
• Mitigation Steps:
– Include branch or job-specific content in the key: “${{ runner.os }}-deploy-${{ github.ref }}-${{ hashFiles('/package-lock.json') }}”.
– Validate cache usage in logs to confirm it is restoring the correct resources. -
“Notify on Failure” May Conflict if concurrency is turned off
• Potential Failure Scenarios: Multiple parallel runs that fail at different points could each create an issue, leading to spammy or redundant bug reports.
• Mitigation Steps:
– Consider using a single channel for failure notifications or grouping them.
– Add logic to detect if an issue already exists, then append comments rather than creating new issues repeatedly.
💡 ROBUSTNESS IMPROVEMENTS:
-
Add Error Handling for Build & Test Steps
• Enhancement: Wrap npm run build and npm test commands with clearer exit guidance. Example:
┌─────────────────────────────
│ - name: Production Build Test
│ run: |
│ if ! npm run build; then
│ echo "Build failed, exiting..."
│ exit 1
│ fi
└─────────────────────────────
• Benefit: Explicitly terminates the workflow if build/test fails in a known way, rather than relying entirely on exit codes. -
Strengthen Input Validation & Logging
• Improvement: Log all relevant environment variables and input choices at the start of each job to help debug unexpected behaviors. Example:
┌─────────────────────────────
│ - name: Log environment
│ run: |
│ echo "Environment Input: ${{ github.event.inputs.environment }}"
│ echo "NODE_ENV: ${{ env.NODE_ENV }}"
└───────────────────────────── -
Concurrency per Environment
• Enhancement: Differentiate concurrency groups so that staging and production deployments do not block or overwrite each other, for instance:
┌─────────────────────────────
│ concurrency:
│ group: "deploy-${{ github.event.inputs.environment }}"
│ cancel-in-progress: true
└─────────────────────────────
• Benefit: Avoids collisions between staging vs. production deployments and ensures each environment handles race conditions correctly. -
Defensive Create Deployment Status Script
• Enhancement: Before calling createDeploymentStatus, confirm the deployment object and step outputs exist. Example:
┌─────────────────────────────
│ const deploymentId = context.payload.deployment?.id || null;
│ if (deploymentId === null) {
│ core.warning("No deployment ID found; skipping status update.");
│ return;
│ }
│ // proceed with status update
└─────────────────────────────
• Benefit: Prevents runtime errors if the deployment is not properly initialized or if the build/deploy step is skipped.
aliakbar-deriv
force-pushed
the
octomind-e2e-integration-workflow-update
branch
from
87f79a1 to
eddb9fd
Compare
aliakbar-deriv
had a problem deploying
to
github-pages
GitHub Actions
Failure
- Simplify artifact handling to fix upload issues - Add quality checks (lint and test) to both workflows - Make preview checks non-blocking for PRs - Enforce strict checks for production - Remove unnecessary complexity - Improve error handling and feedback
aliakbar-deriv
force-pushed
the
octomind-e2e-integration-workflow-update
branch
from
9723a12 to
c6e73af
Compare
aliakbar-deriv
had a problem deploying
to
github-pages
GitHub Actions
Failure
- Add consistent permissions and artifact naming - Improve concurrency settings - Configure proper preview deployments - Add deployment tracking and status updates
aliakbar-deriv
had a problem deploying
to
preview
GitHub Actions
Failure
Summary by Sourcery
Set up deployment to production and preview deployments on pull requests using GitHub Actions. Add CI checks for linting, type checking, unit tests, and end-to-end (E2E) tests. Configure production deployment to be manually triggered and include validation steps. Integrate Octomind for E2E test automation on preview deployments.
CI:
Tests: