Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Integrate depcheck web service #78

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 28, 2015
Merged

Integrate depcheck web service #78

merged 5 commits into from
Nov 28, 2015

Conversation

lijunle
Copy link
Member

@lijunle lijunle commented Nov 28, 2015

@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 97.38%

Merging #78 into master will decrease coverage by -1.56% as of 51cd21b

@@            master     #78   diff @@
======================================
  Files           11      14     +3
  Stmts          285     306    +21
  Branches         0      69    +69
  Methods          0       0       
======================================
+ Hit            282     298    +16
- Partial          0       5     +5
  Missed           3       3

Review entire Coverage Diff as of 51cd21b

Powered by Codecov. Updated on successful CI builds.

lijunle added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2015
@lijunle
Merge pull request #78 from lijunle/depcheck-web
671a558 
Integrate depcheck web service.
@lijunle lijunle merged commit 671a558 into depcheck:master Nov 28, 2015
@lijunle lijunle deleted the depcheck-web branch November 28, 2015 11:28
gtanner pushed a commit to gtanner/depcheck that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2016
@lijunle
Merge pull request depcheck#78 from lijunle/ignore-number
820df57 
Test case to assert ignore require number.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Ignore doc folder in NPM deployment.
2 participants
@lijunle @codecov-io