Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(expect): support expect.addSnapshotSerialize() api #4537

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 2, 2024

Conversation

eryue0220
Copy link
Contributor

This pr is one of part to solve #3964, which is to support expect.addSnapshotSerialize api. But there is still a lot of other work to support serialize plugins. I think it can be divided into a separate PR or Issue for tracking.

@eryue0220 eryue0220 requested a review from kt3k as a code owner March 30, 2024 09:26
…220/deno_std into feat/expect-addSnapshotSerializer

* 'feat/expect-addSnapshotSerializer' of github.com:eryue0220/deno_std:
  deprecation(crypto): rename an export to match style guide, deprecating original and two other obsolete imports (denoland#4525)
  chore: add `--allow-dirty` flag to publish dry run (denoland#4535)
  [unstable] BREAKING(semver): remove comparator.semver field (denoland#4533)
  chore(crypto): upgrade dependencies (denoland#4530)
  0.221.0 (denoland#4531)
  docs(fs): polish documentation (denoland#4526)
  fix(fs): `SubdirectoryMoveError` extends `Error` correctly (denoland#4528)
  chore(fs): remove `test.ts` (denoland#4527)
Copy link
Member

@kt3k kt3k left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks!

@kt3k kt3k merged commit 8227afe into denoland:main Apr 2, 2024
13 checks passed
@kt3k kt3k mentioned this pull request Apr 2, 2024
20 tasks
@eryue0220 eryue0220 deleted the feat/expect-addSnapshotSerializer branch April 2, 2024 13:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants