DLPX-84995 NFSD: Never call nfsd_file_gc() in foreground paths #24
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
ahrens
approved these changes
Mar 17, 2023
sdimitro
approved these changes
Mar 17, 2023
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
prakashsurya
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 4, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 20, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 20, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 26, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 3, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 4, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
prakashsurya
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 8, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 24, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 25, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 27, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 28, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 30, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 31, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 1, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 2, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 3, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 4, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 5, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
grwilson
pushed a commit
to grwilson/linux-kernel-generic
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 7, 2023
…ix#24) The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 20, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 10, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 11, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 22, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 1, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 22, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 27, 2024
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2024
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043422 commit 0b0747d upstream. The following processes run into a deadlock. CPU 41 was waiting for CPU 29 to handle a CSD request while holding spinlock "crashdump_lock", but CPU 29 was hung by that spinlock with IRQs disabled. PID: 17360 TASK: ffff95c1090c5c40 CPU: 41 COMMAND: "mrdiagd" !# 0 [ffffb80edbf37b58] __read_once_size at ffffffff9b871a40 include/linux/compiler.h:185:0 !# 1 [ffffb80edbf37b58] atomic_read at ffffffff9b871a40 arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:27:0 !# 2 [ffffb80edbf37b58] dump_stack at ffffffff9b871a40 lib/dump_stack.c:54:0 # 3 [ffffb80edbf37b78] csd_lock_wait_toolong at ffffffff9b131ad5 kernel/smp.c:364:0 # 4 [ffffb80edbf37b78] __csd_lock_wait at ffffffff9b131ad5 kernel/smp.c:384:0 # 5 [ffffb80edbf37bf8] csd_lock_wait at ffffffff9b13267a kernel/smp.c:394:0 # 6 [ffffb80edbf37bf8] smp_call_function_many at ffffffff9b13267a kernel/smp.c:843:0 # 7 [ffffb80edbf37c50] smp_call_function at ffffffff9b13279d kernel/smp.c:867:0 # 8 [ffffb80edbf37c50] on_each_cpu at ffffffff9b13279d kernel/smp.c:976:0 # 9 [ffffb80edbf37c78] flush_tlb_kernel_range at ffffffff9b085c4b arch/x86/mm/tlb.c:742:0 #10 [ffffb80edbf37cb8] __purge_vmap_area_lazy at ffffffff9b23a1e0 mm/vmalloc.c:701:0 #11 [ffffb80edbf37ce0] try_purge_vmap_area_lazy at ffffffff9b23a2cc mm/vmalloc.c:722:0 #12 [ffffb80edbf37ce0] free_vmap_area_noflush at ffffffff9b23a2cc mm/vmalloc.c:754:0 #13 [ffffb80edbf37cf8] free_unmap_vmap_area at ffffffff9b23bb3b mm/vmalloc.c:764:0 #14 [ffffb80edbf37cf8] remove_vm_area at ffffffff9b23bb3b mm/vmalloc.c:1509:0 #15 [ffffb80edbf37d18] __vunmap at ffffffff9b23bb8a mm/vmalloc.c:1537:0 #16 [ffffb80edbf37d40] vfree at ffffffff9b23bc85 mm/vmalloc.c:1612:0 #17 [ffffb80edbf37d58] megasas_free_host_crash_buffer [megaraid_sas] at ffffffffc020b7f2 drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c:3932:0 #18 [ffffb80edbf37d80] fw_crash_state_store [megaraid_sas] at ffffffffc01f804d drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c:3291:0 #19 [ffffb80edbf37dc0] dev_attr_store at ffffffff9b56dd7b drivers/base/core.c:758:0 #20 [ffffb80edbf37dd0] sysfs_kf_write at ffffffff9b326acf fs/sysfs/file.c:144:0 #21 [ffffb80edbf37de0] kernfs_fop_write at ffffffff9b325fd4 fs/kernfs/file.c:316:0 #22 [ffffb80edbf37e20] __vfs_write at ffffffff9b29418a fs/read_write.c:480:0 #23 [ffffb80edbf37ea8] vfs_write at ffffffff9b294462 fs/read_write.c:544:0 #24 [ffffb80edbf37ee8] SYSC_write at ffffffff9b2946ec fs/read_write.c:590:0 #25 [ffffb80edbf37ee8] SyS_write at ffffffff9b2946ec fs/read_write.c:582:0 #26 [ffffb80edbf37f30] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9b003ca9 arch/x86/entry/common.c:298:0 #27 [ffffb80edbf37f58] entry_SYSCALL_64 at ffffffff9ba001b1 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:238:0 PID: 17355 TASK: ffff95c1090c3d80 CPU: 29 COMMAND: "mrdiagd" !# 0 [ffffb80f2d3c7d30] __read_once_size at ffffffff9b0f2ab0 include/linux/compiler.h:185:0 !# 1 [ffffb80f2d3c7d30] native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath at ffffffff9b0f2ab0 kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:368:0 # 2 [ffffb80f2d3c7d58] pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath at ffffffff9b0f244b arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:674:0 # 3 [ffffb80f2d3c7d58] queued_spin_lock_slowpath at ffffffff9b0f244b arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h:53:0 # 4 [ffffb80f2d3c7d68] queued_spin_lock at ffffffff9b8961a6 include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:90:0 # 5 [ffffb80f2d3c7d68] do_raw_spin_lock_flags at ffffffff9b8961a6 include/linux/spinlock.h:173:0 # 6 [ffffb80f2d3c7d68] __raw_spin_lock_irqsave at ffffffff9b8961a6 include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:122:0 # 7 [ffffb80f2d3c7d68] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave at ffffffff9b8961a6 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:160:0 # 8 [ffffb80f2d3c7d88] fw_crash_buffer_store [megaraid_sas] at ffffffffc01f8129 drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c:3205:0 # 9 [ffffb80f2d3c7dc0] dev_attr_store at ffffffff9b56dd7b drivers/base/core.c:758:0 #10 [ffffb80f2d3c7dd0] sysfs_kf_write at ffffffff9b326acf fs/sysfs/file.c:144:0 #11 [ffffb80f2d3c7de0] kernfs_fop_write at ffffffff9b325fd4 fs/kernfs/file.c:316:0 #12 [ffffb80f2d3c7e20] __vfs_write at ffffffff9b29418a fs/read_write.c:480:0 #13 [ffffb80f2d3c7ea8] vfs_write at ffffffff9b294462 fs/read_write.c:544:0 #14 [ffffb80f2d3c7ee8] SYSC_write at ffffffff9b2946ec fs/read_write.c:590:0 #15 [ffffb80f2d3c7ee8] SyS_write at ffffffff9b2946ec fs/read_write.c:582:0 #16 [ffffb80f2d3c7f30] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9b003ca9 arch/x86/entry/common.c:298:0 #17 [ffffb80f2d3c7f58] entry_SYSCALL_64 at ffffffff9ba001b1 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:238:0 The lock is used to synchronize different sysfs operations, it doesn't protect any resource that will be touched by an interrupt. Consequently it's not required to disable IRQs. Replace the spinlock with a mutex to fix the deadlock. Signed-off-by: Junxiao Bi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Reviewed-by: Mike Christie <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <[email protected]>
pcd1193182
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2024
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
pcd1193182
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2024
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 2, 2024
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 3, 2024
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2024
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
prakashsurya
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 26, 2024
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
jwk404
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 14, 2024
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
jwk404
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2024
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
jwk404
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2024
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
jwk404
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2024
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 20, 2024
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 16, 2024
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 30, 2024
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
This was referenced Jul 30, 2024
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2024
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Background
Recent escalations uncovered a bug in the NFS server file cache where lots of NFSv4 file opens causes the NFSD threads to consume a majority of CPU resources. This excessive kernel CPU consumption can cause the system to be non-responsive.
Problem
Per the upstream commit:
Solution
Pull in the upstream commit that stops calling nfsd_file_gc() inline for nfsd threads.
Testing Done
ab-pre-push: http://selfservice.jenkins.delphix.com/job/appliance-build-orchestrator-pre-push/4832/
Tested before/after with 17,000 opened files on a NFSv4 mount and ran a workload that cause lots of churn. For the before case, a 30 second kernel profile has NFSD using 36% CPU, whereas for the fixed kernel it is only using 6% CPU
Before:
With the fix:
Future Work
There are additional upstream fixes in this problem space that would require refactoring to bring in since they are based off of a 6.1 kernel and we currently are running 5.4 kernels.