Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

throw a message if tf runtime is incompatible #797

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jun 26, 2021

Conversation

njzjz
Copy link
Member

@njzjz njzjz commented Jun 25, 2021

fix #406, #447, #557, #774 and #796.

This was linked to issues Jun 25, 2021
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jun 25, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #797 (ac58443) into devel (4555034) will decrease coverage by 0.08%.
The diff coverage is 52.38%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel     #797      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   74.05%   73.96%   -0.09%     
==========================================
  Files          84       84              
  Lines        6576     6588      +12     
==========================================
+ Hits         4870     4873       +3     
- Misses       1706     1715       +9     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
deepmd/env.py 74.07% <52.38%> (-8.54%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4555034...ac58443. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@amcadmus amcadmus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR checks the compile-time TF version with the run-time TF version, and raise a runtime error if the versions do not match.

However, sometimes in compatible compile-time and run-time TF versions are allowed, do I understand it correctly? If so, we should raise an warning message rather than an error.

Copy link
Member

@amcadmus amcadmus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree with most of the changes made by this PR, except one thing described below

This PR checks the compile-time TF version with the run-time TF version, and raise a runtime error if the versions do not match.

However, sometimes in compatible compile-time and run-time TF versions are allowed, do I understand it correctly? If so, we should raise an warning message rather than an error.

@amcadmus
Copy link
Member

I agree with most of the changes made by this PR, except one thing described below

This PR checks the compile-time TF version with the run-time TF version, and raise a runtime error if the versions do not match.

However, sometimes in compatible compile-time and run-time TF versions are allowed, do I understand it correctly? If so, we should raise an warning message rather than an error.

outdated, please ignore this review

@amcadmus amcadmus merged commit b145ca3 into deepmodeling:devel Jun 26, 2021
@njzjz njzjz deleted the tf_version2 branch June 26, 2021 17:18
gzq942560379 pushed a commit to HPC-AI-Team/deepmd-kit that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2021
* throw a message if tf runtime is incompatible

fix deepmodeling#557 and deepmodeling#796.

* still raise if tf version is correct

* detect TF_CXX11_ABI_FLAG

* format codes

* fix lint

* move messages into the function

* fix lint

* fix lints
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants