ci: make coverage computation work #220
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
the
Type: CI
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #220 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 0.00% 96.71% +96.71%
===========================================
Files 40 40
Lines 973 973
===========================================
+ Hits 0 941 +941
+ Misses 973 32 -941
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
deepcharles
added
Type: Maintenance
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Coverage reports were not uploaded to
codecov. The PR that stops generating coverage reports is :We noticed it while switching to the new Codecov Uploader due to depreciation of the one we were using (see here for explanations). But, I introduced an error while using the
pytest-covcommand line options. Indeed, for some reasons, what used to work does not work anymore. Seems like there are some ambiguities while specifying the path the to source to be tested if we do it at thepytest/pytest-covlevel (either pointing to the sources or to the package name).Solution :
coverage(found the doc here).pyproject.toml)