Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix key type bug in Secp256k1 #64

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 9, 2023
Merged

Fix key type bug in Secp256k1 #64

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 9, 2023

Conversation

tomdaffurn
Copy link
Contributor

Overview

Fix some copy + paste bugs in Secp256k1

@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ dependencies {
implementation("org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk15on:1.70")
implementation("org.bouncycastle:bcpkix-jdk15on:1.70")
implementation(project(":common"))
testImplementation(kotlin("test"))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

mostly unrelated to this PR (esp. because i'm using this in dids as well), should we use junit5 instead?

Copy link
Contributor

@mistermoe mistermoe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🏅

import com.nimbusds.jose.JWSAlgorithm
import com.nimbusds.jose.jwk.KeyType
import com.nimbusds.jose.jwk.KeyUse
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.*
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i think detekt usually chokes on star imports

@tomdaffurn tomdaffurn merged commit 6901ced into main Oct 9, 2023
3 checks passed
@mistermoe mistermoe deleted the tom/secp256k1-bugs branch November 1, 2023 00:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants