-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Test for did:dht signed VCs + release #322
Conversation
Review or Edit in CodeSandboxOpen the branch in Web Editor • VS Code • Insiders |
signOptions = { | ||
issuerDid : alice.did, | ||
subjectDid : alice.did, | ||
kid : alice.did + '#' + alice.did.split(':')[2], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the key ID should be the ID of the verification method, in this case it's alice.did + #0
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
approving pending small comments
Approving even though all of the tests are failing? 🙃 |
@frankhinek if our pre commit hooks work properly then merging is blocked until they pass. the contents of the PR seem correct even if there are minor fixable test issues. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since we're going to release @web5/api
version 0.8.3
later this week per Angie's announcement on Discord the version
string in packages/api/package.json
should also be set to 0.8.2
for this PR.
Co-authored-by: Frank Hinek <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Gabe <[email protected]>
Upon reviewing the changes in this PR and the failing tests, I noticed that the updated version of |
TBDocs Report ✅ No errors or warnings @web5/api
Updated @ 2023-11-29T14:37:40.097Z - Commit: |
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #322 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 91.77% 91.77%
=======================================
Files 73 73
Lines 15758 15758
Branches 1448 1448
=======================================
Hits 14462 14462
Misses 1270 1270
Partials 26 26
|
@frankhinek I understand your perspective, but respectfully disagree. This is the value of having multiple reviewers with different areas of expertise. Our review system worked as desired, as we noticed different issues with the changes, and the changes were not able to be merged without them being addressed (via hooks and your change request). I have high trust in my colleagues to address requested changes and merge when they feel sufficient review has been completed (and CI passes, as is enforced). |
Signed-off-by: Frank Hinek <[email protected]>
Note: Validated that all browser tests pass despite flaky GitHub runner / Karma timeouts @shamilovtim has that issue almost solved here: #316 |
Signed-off-by: Frank Hinek <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Frank Hinek <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Frank Hinek <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Frank Hinek <[email protected]>
No description provided.