-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 105
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Return 204 when there is no data #790
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #790 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 98.69% 98.69%
=======================================
Files 73 73
Lines 11264 11269 +5
Branches 1609 1612 +3
=======================================
+ Hits 11117 11122 +5
Misses 141 141
Partials 6 6 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
@LiranCohen ready for review. Would appreciate some 👀 ! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome stuff!! Just a small nit if you can think of a good blurb to go above it explaining why we return a different code for that reason.
@LiranCohen is it cool to merge bypassing branch protections? |
NOTE: The CVE was discovered in, and is being fixed by this PR waiting to be merged: Therefore I am bypassing the branch protections for merging this. |
Fixes #695
Additionally, changes the
scripts.test
value so that source maps are correct and point to the actual implementation files instead of the transpiled JS files.