RecordsPermissionScope Revocation must be scoped to a protocol

[LiranCohen]

In order to get Permission Revocation messages associated with a specific protocol from the MessageStore it is necessary for the revocation messages to be tagged with the protocol from the grant scope.

In this PR:

• added an optional protocol property to the PermissionRevocationCreateOptions which normalizes and adds the provided protocol as a tag.
• added a preProcessingForCoreRecordsWrite method to the RecordsWriteHandler where if the incoming message is a revocation message, the original grant will be fetched and the protocol tag from the revocation will be compared to the grant scope protocol.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.57%. Comparing base (94da019) to head (b00b990).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #754      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   98.55%   98.57%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          73       73              
  Lines       10929    10986      +57     
  Branches     1573     1582       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits        10771    10829      +58     
+ Misses        152      151       -1     
  Partials        6        6              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[thehenrytsai]

Legit! And thanks for breaking up the PRs! Really makes reviewing a much pleasant and efficient experience.

Happy to chat if you'd like!

[thehenrytsai]

🐐 🚀

Optional nit:

Do you think passing the message JSON directly for revocation creation is easier as dev-ex?

Non-blocking, code can be merged as is, and can be done later even if you agree.

Upon reviewing your code, I realized some of the typing isn't ideal (my code) and I probably meant to fix it but just forgot. A small PR will quickly follow this one it's merged.

[LiranCohen]

Do you think passing the message JSON directly for revocation creation is easier as dev-ex?

Yeah I was debating this, but wasn't sure which object the user would have more readily available so i opted with the parsed type.

I'll merge this in and we can improve it a bit in a subsequent PR. 🙏