docs: update README.md to align with the style in the README

[gitressa]

The Issue

It says in the README:

12. Update the README.md header in Title Case format, for example, use # DDEV Redis, not # ddev-redis.

the README itself should follow that advice as well :)

How This PR Solves The Issue

Updates the title of the header to use Title Case.

Manual Testing Instructions

Automated Testing Overview

Related Issue Link(s)

Release/Deployment Notes

[rfay]

Looks great, just would probably leave behind the v1.23.4 old ddev get since we're touching it.

[rfay]

Update the README.md header in Title Case format, for example, use # DDEV Redis, not # ddev-redis.

I don't think this is a good idea. Not sure where it came from. I'm afraid "DDEV Redis" is not a thing, but ddev-redis is.

[gitressa]

It's from the template guide: https://github.com/ddev/ddev-addon-template?tab=readme-ov-file#getting-started.

[rfay]

Right. I think you added it, and I wasn't paying adequate attention :)

[gitressa]

Heh, that could be! Though in the comment below from you, it sounds like you did evaluate the proposal. But as a Danish prime minister once said, "You have a standpoint, until you take a new one" :)

I don't see any reason this shouldn't be done, but the best path is for you to do PRs in the various repos, which I think you've already started, thanks.

From ddev/ddev#5641.

[rfay]

It's fine in the context of the template, where the DDEV Add-on Template is a "thing", but IMO it doesn't make sense in add-ons.

[gitressa]

I do see a slight advantage in using the machine name in the title, and streamlining the style guide to use that, so that people can then memorize it, for later use on the CLI.

So in other words, it should be the reverse, like this?

12. Update the README.md header, adding the machine name of the add-on, for example # ddev-redis, not # DDEV Redis.

I can create an MR if you confirm.

[rfay]

I do prefer that, thanks. You can do it in this PR if you want.

[gitressa]

Great, the MR is now updated. I reversed the order to Header first and then Description, since that's usually the workflow.

[rfay]

Works for me, thanks.