Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add type boolean #190

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 22, 2022
Merged

add type boolean #190

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 22, 2022

Conversation

jpmmcneill
Copy link
Contributor

resolves #189

Description

redshift component of dbt-labs/dbt-core#5739

Checklist

@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla:yes label Sep 19, 2022
@dbeatty10 dbeatty10 added the ready_for_review Externally contributed PR has functional approval, ready for code review from Core engineering label Sep 20, 2022
@dbeatty10
Copy link
Contributor

@jpmmcneill Now that dbt-labs/dbt-core#5875 has been merged, just two things and then this should be ready!

  1. Click the "update branch" button (or merge the latest changes from main some other way)
  2. Restore the original version of dbt-requirements.txt

If all looks good after CI runs, then we'll merge.

@dbeatty10 dbeatty10 merged commit c2c09c7 into dbt-labs:main Sep 22, 2022
abbywh pushed a commit to abbywh/dbt-redshift that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2023
* add type boolean

* changie result
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla:yes ready_for_review Externally contributed PR has functional approval, ready for code review from Core engineering
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[CT-1210] [Feature] Cross-database macro for type_boolean()
2 participants