Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix package installation in appveyor on debian platforms #428

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 21, 2023

Conversation

christian-monch
Copy link
Contributor

Currently the construction of the test environment on appveyor is failing in debian-based environments. It fails during apt-get update due to changed release infos for debian packages. This PR allows allows apt-get update to continue in changes in release info. This should fix the tests on debian-based appveyor environments.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 21, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: -0.02 ⚠️

Comparison is base (bcfeee3) 92.04% compared to head (b42ac64) 92.03%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #428      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.04%   92.03%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         122      122              
  Lines        9034     9034              
==========================================
- Hits         8315     8314       -1     
- Misses        719      720       +1     

see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

Copy link
Member

@adswa adswa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

seems to work! 🎉

Copy link
Member

@mih mih left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Much appreciated!!!

The should go into the extension template too, I think.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants