fix(ui) Followups to recent changes to UI ingestion forms

[chriscollins3456]

We recently merged in a big change to ingestion forms in the UI and this PR addresses some followups after that.

• Pass in removeMargin optional prop for styling to SecretField
• Add typescript typing to our RECIPE_FIELDS object
• Simplify value setting logic by allowing our main value setter to work for fieldPaths that are both strings and a list of strings (for field keys that are dotted ie. sasl.username)
• Update some incorrect tooltips

Checklist

• The PR conforms to DataHub's Contributing Guideline (particularly Commit Message Format)
• Links to related issues (if applicable)
• Tests for the changes have been added/updated (if applicable)
• Docs related to the changes have been added/updated (if applicable). If a new feature has been added a Usage Guide has been added for the same.
• For any breaking change/potential downtime/deprecation/big changes an entry has been made in Updating DataHub

[github-actions]

Unit Test Results (build & test)

499 tests  ±0   499 ✔️ ±0   8m 15s ⏱️ -5s
115 suites ±0       0 💤 ±0 
115 files   ±0       0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit fcd2415. ± Comparison against base commit 2b2488e.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[gabe-lyons]

nice to be able to simplify this!

[gabe-lyons]

out of curiosity, why did you opt for interface here? I usually use type

[chriscollins3456]

so as far as I understand, the two are very often interchangeable. I usually default to interface because interface names show up in error messages which helps for debugging and have some extra functionality like extending (not that I'm using that here). I have always used type for basically giving a name to a primitive type for readability.

I don't think either are wrong and neither is the obvious right choice either!

[gabe-lyons]

are the dotted fields only able to be provided that way? so if you put

sasl:
  username: true

that would be considered invalid in the kafka recipe?

[chriscollins3456]

are the dotted fields only able to be provided that way? so if you put

sasl:
  username: true

that would be considered invalid in the kafka recipe?

@gabe-lyons I'm actually not positive. I'd like to think this would still be considered valid, but I never dug too deep into it. I just know in our docs and example recipe we have the dotted key like sasl.username: {value} so I just decided to keep that convention when building through the form