-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 358
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix idxmax() / idxmin() for Series work properly #1078
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1078 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 95.2% 95.19% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 34 34
Lines 6868 6935 +67
==========================================
+ Hits 6539 6602 +63
- Misses 329 333 +4
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm, this current implementation runs Spark jobs three times.
I guess we should just use F.monotonically_increasing_id()
instead of index_scols
in the previous PR #1065?
Can you make tests passed at Python 3.5 too @itholic? |
What do you think about #1078 (review)?
|
@ueshin Ah! sorry i got missed that comment. 😢 It makes sense. Thanks for the comment i fixed it!! 👍 |
Softagram Impact Report for pull/1078 (head commit: 9b41867)
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
Thanks! merging. |
Thanks :) |
Reopen of #1065
fix more properly with considering of more examples commented at #1065 (comment)