Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Merge master 21.1.0 back into develop #6181

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Aug 9, 2024

Conversation

UdjinM6
Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 commented Aug 8, 2024

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

What was done?

How Has This Been Tested?

Breaking Changes

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone (for repository code-owners and collaborators only)

PastaPastaPasta and others added 9 commits August 7, 2024 15:37
…re no longer non-locked

d8449ae fix: stop trying to sign pending txes when they are no longer non-locked (UdjinM6)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  Masternodes keep trying to sign txes they received initially even after these txes were replaced by is/chain-locked txes later.

  ## What was done?
  Remove entries from `pendingRetryTxs` when txes are removed from `nonLockedTxs` set (as either already locked or as conflicted, doesn't matter).

  ## How Has This Been Tested?

  ## Breaking Changes

  ## Checklist:
  - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

ACKs for top commit:
  PastaPastaPasta:
    utACK d8449ae
  knst:
    utACK d8449ae

Tree-SHA512: 45983faad6d590d4e44fc195c77d73d216e3d0bebef963fe556688773c82c07a118916f56fde7f1213df19d4fb9b7d82d8fd51abecd8e6c2108c27d62d0426c1
38ecd6f test: reduce BRRHeight on regtest (Odysseas Gabrielides)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  In regtest, Block Reward Reallocation is buried at height 2500, which happens after v20 activation.

  ## What was done?
  Reduced BRRHeight in regtest from 2500 to 1000.
  The purpose of this change is to simplify regtests of Platform as well.
  Note: This change affects only regtest.

  ## How Has This Been Tested?
  tests

  ## Breaking Changes
  no, this only affects Regtest (where we make no guarantees about breaking stuff)

  ## Checklist:
  - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

Top commit has no ACKs.

Tree-SHA512: b5a1c2b2c2b70682f266d9d0af9e048a03417c0cb2480eb5ab5838965342b6465acd10d8dac5a0d3c5c5f59f4e36ac5b909a838bc3805c2265a83776e92b4827
3783b70 chore: bump protocol version to 70233 (Odysseas Gabrielides)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented

  ## What was done?
  Bumped protocol version to 70233

  ## How Has This Been Tested?

  ## Breaking Changes

  ## Checklist:
  - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

ACKs for top commit:
  PastaPastaPasta:
    utACK 3783b70
  knst:
    utACK 3783b70

Tree-SHA512: 3f5f04fcc31c5381a1ddce408a3c31876ca6d58ff229c80784ab938be70c3820b773c5db7f0c77fb7a00cc03dbefb70a42b81a0bf17195b78b47cee1e12310b5
6f82a56 feat: add option to AsyncSignIfMember to allow signing same requestID on different msgHashes (pasta)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  Please see: https://www.dash.org/forum/index.php?threads/ehf-activation-issues.55146/ for a description of this issue

  ## What was done?
  Allow re-signing specifically for EHF messages, this is important as due to rotation, and duplicate requestIDs a member will refuse to re-sign when they participate in a later quorum.

  ## How Has This Been Tested?
  Devnet deployed with a mix of this version, older versions and current v21.0

  ## Breaking Changes
  This doesn't introduce any breaking changes

  ## Checklist:
    _Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
  - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

Top commit has no ACKs.

Tree-SHA512: a758e6363901624d8540983ad09085d47a33fe61e8e576ec4317b051a0f988efb983bd06d9894bcce19c9f587ad703022ce00ceddd3760d7c9d382878f40c2d7
d32a03c chore: update man pages (Konstantin Akimov)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  V21.1 preparation

  ## What was done?
  Update manpages

  ## How Has This Been Tested?
  n/a

  ## Breaking Changes
  n/a

  ## Checklist:
  - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

ACKs for top commit:
  PastaPastaPasta:
    utACK d32a03c

Tree-SHA512: a16036121c48597d80eefcf9232afb8f2da20d7b2e45de4beac31f025f3d8d638f5006e0bb52f706e08235fca172ddfc3309fd143734d37a14776cd7e8842128
8e9dd12 chore: bump version in configure.ac (pasta)
afb8dc0 docs: add v21.1.0 release notes and archive v21.0.2 (pasta)
269dd02 Merge dashpay#6179: chore: update manpages v21.1 (pasta)
a8cb643 Merge dashpay#6175: feat: allow resigning for EHF (pasta)
de5cc22 Merge dashpay#6178: chore: bump protocol version to 70233 (pasta)
2de4ce5 Merge dashpay#6176: test: reduce BRRHeight in regtest (pasta)
840175e Merge dashpay#6174: fix: stop trying to sign pending txes when they are no longer non-locked (pasta)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  Backports for v21.1.0, add release notes and

  ## What was done?
  See commits

  ## How Has This Been Tested?
  Been on devnet

  ## Breaking Changes
  None

  ## Checklist:
    _Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
  - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

ACKs for top commit:
  knst:
    utACK  8e9dd12

Tree-SHA512: 3c968c4f0e06bc88f63bf10f742d39595c45c7fcd4aef1891d2e76d9f443cae1ddd3cb84c787faa189ef3a189a9dd63a7f75e69f5787a47d1281d5b6a445a2a6
@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 added this to the 21.2 milestone Aug 8, 2024
@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 requested review from knst and PastaPastaPasta and removed request for knst August 8, 2024 09:04
Copy link
Member

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK 058ff45

Copy link
Collaborator

@kwvg kwvg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK 058ff45

Copy link
Collaborator

@knst knst left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta merged commit e803b32 into dashpay:develop Aug 9, 2024
8 of 9 checks passed
@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 modified the milestones: 21.2, 22 Oct 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants