Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding 'once' option to GrowToEdge action. #7

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: work
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

deters
Copy link

@deters deters commented Sep 2, 2013

danakj and others added 6 commits September 1, 2013 15:17
Currently the code rolls its own binary search, but now that we have
a well-tested binary search implementation in obt/ we can make use
of that.
This extend the client_find_resize_directional() method to support
two growing modes, and return a bool for whether it was able to grow/shrink.

The client_find_resize_directional() method now takes an enum instead
of a bool, with two growing modes. The old mode which always tries to
grow, the a new mode that will only grow if the client's edge is not
already at a grow stopping point (ie against the edge of another window).
This change points out how useless the return value from client_find_resize_directional()
was, so it also removes that.

When all edges are blocked, the FillToEdge action will try to grow all four edges agin
without blocking any of them on their current edge. This more closely matches the
behaviour of the GrowToEdge action.
@deters
Copy link
Author

deters commented Sep 2, 2013

The "once" option will work on GrowToFill and GrowToEdge* actions...

What do you think changing the name of this option to "confined"? It would be more clear it's purpose...

@danakj
Copy link
Owner

danakj commented Sep 2, 2013

About "once" vs "confined" I agree "once" isn't ideal, but I'm not sold on confined either. If you window overlaps another window, it'll still grow more until the edge of the next window. I'll think about names some more, but once is good for now I think.

@deters
Copy link
Author

deters commented Sep 3, 2013

Made new pull request: #8

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants