Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add create_repository_using_definitions_args #11141

Merged

Conversation

schrockn
Copy link
Member

@schrockn schrockn commented Dec 15, 2022

Summary & Motivation: Based on writing the README/announcement for Definitions, I'm anticipating requests from existing users to create named repositories but using the typed APIs and resource manipulations of Definitions. Adding create_repository_using_definitions_args which can be used for that purpose.

Also added an extensive test case for the executor and logger behaviors on all the various permutations of jobs to ensure that executors and loggers are assigned properly.

Test Plan: BK

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 15, 2022

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated
dagster ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add your feedback Dec 15, 2022 at 4:28PM (UTC)
1 Ignored Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated
dagit-storybook ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Dec 15, 2022 at 4:28PM (UTC)

schrockn and others added 2 commits December 14, 2022 20:22
Created using spr 1.3.4
Created using spr 1.3.4

[skip ci]
Created using spr 1.3.4
Created using spr 1.3.4
@schrockn schrockn requested review from sryza and yuhan December 15, 2022 03:32
Created using spr 1.3.4

[skip ci]
Created using spr 1.3.4
@schrockn schrockn changed the base branch from schrockn/master.add-create_repository_using_definitions_args to master December 15, 2022 17:09
@schrockn schrockn merged commit b16f30c into master Dec 15, 2022
@schrockn schrockn deleted the schrockn/add-create_repository_using_definitions_args branch December 15, 2022 17:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants