Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

migration of component testing from 6.X to 7.0 #3759

Merged
merged 26 commits into from
Apr 1, 2021

Conversation

elevatebart
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@elevatebart elevatebart changed the title docs: migration of ct to 7 migration of component testing from 6.X to 7.0 Mar 30, 2021
Copy link
Member

@jennifer-shehane jennifer-shehane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Committed directly so we can get this in quicker. Just a couple questions I noted in line of the code. Should be good after that.

  • Moved the component testing migration further up in migration notes, within 7.0 migration.
  • more use of conjunctions
  • some spelling fixes
  • clarify on some pieces, like config/support files
  • shorten code examples to remove scroll
  • Component Testing should always be lowercase.
  • h5 level to bold since styling is not great.
  • other minor editing.

content/guides/references/migration-guide.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
content/guides/references/migration-guide.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jennifer-shehane jennifer-shehane mentioned this pull request Mar 30, 2021
14 tasks
@jennifer-shehane jennifer-shehane self-requested a review March 30, 2021 19:52
@jennifer-shehane
Copy link
Member

Last I heard @JessicaSachs wanted to review this and confirm the changes.

@JessicaSachs
Copy link
Contributor

It's ready for another review if necessary. I kept the formatting and tried to adhere to the writing style. This is going to break 100% of CT users, so I wanted to provide a thorough migration guide.

Copy link
Member

@jennifer-shehane jennifer-shehane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I opened a PR with some more suggestions. #3766

Copy link
Member

@jennifer-shehane jennifer-shehane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I still think this could benefit from being reduced in size, but going to approve to move things along.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants